[OSM-talk] [Talk-GB] Not-properly-Open-but-called-Open

[Anthony]

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd suggest that if and when there is a "more open" OCM, then you might
> argue to replace Andy's one with it. I don't see a point in shooting
> ourselves in the foot before then.
>

Do you see the point in building OSM in the first place?

As I said, I don't think it's shooting ourselves in the foot.  I see it as
using a crutch when we're perfectly capable of walking on our own.  It's a
judgment call, but I think the long-term benefits to the project of telling
Andy "thanks but no thanks" outweigh the short-term advantages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100104/1fd3c7e1/attachment.html>