[OSM-talk] [Candidacy] AGM Foundation 2010 - Girona

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jul 5 10:29:48 BST 2010


2010/7/4 Oliver (skobbler) <osm.oliver.kuehn at gmx.de>:
> exclusive. I just say that the more projects there are, the longer it takes
> to achieve a specific goal.


if one is a cyclist with interest in cycling, she/he will not go out
mapping parking lots or petrol stations just because someones declares
that they are important. The same is for adresses: it is not much fun
to map them, and therefore few people do it ;-)


> if people map trees unless attributes with a wider use have been captured in
> this region. I am pretty sure that some of these people who map trees would
> be happy giving a hint what is important for the OpenStreetMap community and
> map other elements instead. And until nobody tells them what is important
> for the OpenStreetMap community they map what they think is right.


actually I don't understand why so many people complain about mapping
trees. Trees have generally a longer life cycle than buildings. I like
trees and I like to have them in the map. Why should I map postboxes?
I hardly send any letters.

Cheers,
Martin




More information about the talk mailing list