[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 18 July 2010 22:19, Simon Ward <simon at bleah.co.uk> wrote:
> This also shows that simply asking if contributors will allow their
> contributions to come under the ODbL is not enough.  I imagine many have

That may be ok, but the CTs go a step further and have future licenses
as being fairly open ended, which makes your next point valid:

> done both their own surveys, the data from which they might be happy to
> relicense, and derivatives of other data (Nearmap, Yahoo!, etc), which
> they may not be able to relicense.