[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[Anthony]

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:22 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 19 July 2010 06:18, TimSC <mapping at sheerman-chase.org.uk> wrote:
> > It's not a question of OSMF member support, I am talking about how
> > share-alike encourages business to share data with OSM.
>
> Then why mention produced work, since ODBL and cc-by-sa both encourage
> sharing the underlying data?


ODbL doesn't even cover the underlying data.  And so far no one has answered
the question as to how produced works aren't a huge loophole.  If someone
creates a produced work with the data and licenses the produced work under
CC-BY, what stops someone else from taking that produced work, extracting
the data, and now having the data under CC-BY?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100718/696fc839/attachment.html>