[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[Richard Weait]

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:06 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg at gmail.com> wrote:
[ snip ]
> Maybe when you say ODbL you mean ODbL + CT, but I'll just point out
> that John didn't seem to oppose ODbL, perhaps the opposite, just
> opposing to the text of the CT.  The CT is also what nearmap is not
> accepting and what I would have trouble accepting.

I don't recall seeing the nice folks from NearMap posting on this
thread.  I do recall an assertion from another poster that NearMap is
firm on the map data being Share-Alike, as is will be under ODbL.  But
no quotations attributed to NearMap, nor posts from them here.  I
think it does a disservice to NearMap to presume that anybody other
than their staff speak for them.