[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

andrzej zaborowski balrogg at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 00:37:58 BST 2010


On 19 July 2010 01:04, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:06 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg at gmail.com> wrote:
> [ snip ]
>> Maybe when you say ODbL you mean ODbL + CT, but I'll just point out
>> that John didn't seem to oppose ODbL, perhaps the opposite, just
>> opposing to the text of the CT.  The CT is also what nearmap is not
>> accepting and what I would have trouble accepting.
>
> I don't recall seeing the nice folks from NearMap posting on this
> thread.  I do recall an assertion from another poster that NearMap is
> firm on the map data being Share-Alike, as is will be under ODbL.  But
> no quotations attributed to NearMap, nor posts from them here.  I
> think it does a disservice to NearMap to presume that anybody other
> than their staff speak for them.

I meant it just in the same way somebody presented the position of
Yahoo in this thread, and elsewhere we're saying "don't trace from
Google maps as their terms don't allow that" even though possibly
nobody from Google has said it in the given thread.

Cheers




More information about the talk mailing list