[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

Peteris Krisjanis pecisk at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 15:26:12 BST 2010


2010/7/19 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:
..........


Ok, Frederik, I understand (but don't accept) your arguments here, but
to push discussion in more practical way: what to do with data
providers like Nearmap? How to convince them?

Does OSMF have clear plans to convince such data providers to
subscribe to planned CT regime? Is there communication going on?

Cheers,
Peter.




More information about the talk mailing list