[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[John Smith]

On 20 July 2010 00:26, Peteris Krisjanis <pecisk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, Frederik, I understand (but don't accept) your arguments here, but
> to push discussion in more practical way: what to do with data
> providers like Nearmap? How to convince them?

You also have both the Australian and New Zealand (no doubt others
too) that released under cc-by, cc-by isn't compatible with the new
CTs, how much time and effort is going to be spent trying to convince
all these entities to agree to the new CTs exactly?