[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Peteris Krisjanis]

2010/7/19 SteveC <steve at asklater.com>:

> Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my phone)

Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
as requirement for any new open and free license in CT point 3. It
would help to ease problems with big data contributors which could
agree with ODBL (as it still have SA and Attribution), but are uneasy
about clarification of point 3 in CT.

Already thanks for answer,
cheers,
Peter.