[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
> as requirement for any new open and free license in CT point 3. It
> would help to ease problems with big data contributors which could
> agree with ODBL (as it still have SA and Attribution), but are uneasy
> about clarification of point 3 in CT.

1. Who are these big data contributors?

2. Is it clear that they have issues with the CT or are you only guessing?

3. Is it clear that these issues will vanish by what you propose or are 
you only guessing?

4. Is their contribution so important to OSM that OSM will let them 
decide what licenses are acceptable for us?

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"