[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Simon Ward]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:55:42PM +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
> as requirement for any new open and free license in CT point 3. It
> would help to ease problems with big data contributors which could
> agree with ODBL (as it still have SA and Attribution), but are uneasy
> about clarification of point 3 in CT.

+1

Or remove the relicensing ability totally.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100719/21804f7f/attachment.pgp>