[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[SteveC]

That's really for the LWG to answer...

On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> 2010/7/19 SteveC <steve at asklater.com>:
> 
>> Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my phone)
> 
> Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
> as requirement for any new open and free license in CT point 3. It
> would help to ease problems with big data contributors which could
> agree with ODBL (as it still have SA and Attribution), but are uneasy
> about clarification of point 3 in CT.
> 
> Already thanks for answer,
> cheers,
> Peter.
> 

Steve

stevecoast.com