[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Simon Biber]

Ulf Möller <osm at ulfm.de> wrote:

> The LWG has stated that specific contributor terms will be considered on a case 
>by case basis for external data sources. If NearMap are happy with the ODbL but 
>not with the Contributor Terms then maybe that should be done here.

So can these specific contributor terms be available for anyone who  wants to 
contribute in Australia? At a guess, perhaps 90% of active  mappers in Australia 
have used NearMap as one of their sources and are  therefore unable to agree to 
the current contributor terms.