[OSM-talk] A plea for meaning ful changeset comments

[David Earl]

On 31/07/2010 11:52, Pieren wrote:
> Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the
> only important information that cannot be retrieved by software and is
> required to justify some actions e.g. features displacements. We should
> better replace 'comment' by 'source' in the changeset tags (and leave it
> optional not like comments in JOSM).

You can see the "what" but never the "why".

David