[OSM-talk] A plea for meaning ful changeset comments

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David Earl <david at frankieandshadow.com>wrote:

> On 31/07/2010 11:52, Pieren wrote:
>
>> Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the
>> only important information that cannot be retrieved by software and is
>> required to justify some actions e.g. features displacements. We should
>> better replace 'comment' by 'source' in the changeset tags (and leave it
>> optional not like comments in JOSM).
>>
>
> You can see the "what" but never the "why".


+1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100731/2fd444a1/attachment.html>