[OSM-talk] Tagging for street danger levels

[Paul Houle]

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/6/23 Anthony <osm at inbox.org>:
>   
>> The alternative would be to have three different ways.
>> Neither solution is particularly nice, though.  I'm actually hoping someone
>> will come up with something better :).
>>     
>
>
> use three ways and connect them with area relations ;-)
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
>   
    Now that I think of it,  I wonder about the right way to represent 
the traffic network in the Netherlands,  where a single roadway might 
have a tram track,  lanes for cars,  bicycle paths,  a sidewalk,  a 
canal,  and probably some other things too,  all exquisitely threaded 
through intersections.

    Of course,  land use policy in polderized areas is more like land 
use policy on a space colony than it is like in most places on Earth.

    Intercity bicycle paths in the sector NW of Amsterdam (that I'm a 
little familiar with) look pretty good on the "Cycle Map" but I notice 
there are some nice recreational areas that don't show up on the "Cycle 
Map" that would be good destinations for tourists lucky enough to rent a 
bike there.