[OSM-talk] Changed highway=*_link meaning?!

[Anthony]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine <lester at lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> Ed Avis wrote:
>
>> Isn't this tagging redundant?  If a link road leads from a primary to a
>> secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the
>> two
>> roads it connects.  In principle there is no need to duplicate the
>> information.
>>
>
> But how do you know that a way IS a slip from one road to another, and not
> just another road?


You could always have highway=link.

But IMO, it's not a big enough deal to bother changing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100624/a9896c7f/attachment.html>