[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] GSoC'10

[Graham Jones]

Mike,
I have not the faintest idea what that means, but it sounds impressive!
Please add it to the list, but it would be nice to define some of the terms
and abbreviations to help the ignorant like me!

Thanks

Graham.

On 11 March 2010 22:39, jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com <
jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Description :
>
> Integration of the java swoop ontology editor into JOSM. A JOSM ontology
> plugin.
>
> Work :
>
> 1. create a live mapping from OSM into RDF , so that the swoop can access
> the data in OSM without conversion.
> 2. be able to have the changes in the rdf be reflected back into the OSM.
> 4. conversion of the wiki into OWL, so that the rules and relations of the
> OSM are documented formally.
> 5. running of the pellet inference engine and all the other reasoning tools
> from swoop to infer new facts and validate the data.
> 6. encoding of the rules of the JOSM validator into OWL rules, maybe we
> will have to include new derived geometric things like if two ways intersect
> and also ways to only process data in a certain radius.
>
> mike
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Graham Jones <
> grahamjones139 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I agree that improving documentation would be  a really useful
>> contribution to OSM, but Google are quite explicit that this is outside of
>> the scope of GSoC (
>> http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#doc_proposals
>> ).
>>
>> A project along the lines of 'context sensitive help in OSM editors' could
>> be a possibility though.  I have never worked on one of the main editors, so
>> I have no idea how hard this would be from that point of view.  The
>> Artifical Intelligence aspects are quite difficult in themselves though - it
>> would have to try to guess what you would like to do from what you have just
>> done - quite a challenge, but please add it to the list if you can manage to
>> describe it!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Graham.
>>
>>
>> On 11 March 2010 10:59, jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com <
>> jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> lets put it in a different perspective :
>>>
>>> Make the documentation as part of the program!
>>>
>>> I would like to see for example a help system that is integrated to the
>>> wiki,
>>> Click on a tag, have it pull up the wiki entry, be able to add new
>>> unknown tags or rename them.
>>> We could even have an OWL Ontology created with a reasoning engine to
>>> specify rules for tagging.
>>>
>>> Really, the software should be so good that you dont need docs or videos.
>>>
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <pecisk at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> > GSoc
>>>> > student pool is a very talented one - it would be good to use them for
>>>> more
>>>> > critical things. Of course, OSM unlike other projects is basically a
>>>> > collection of tools maintained by various people, so difficult to
>>>> achieve a
>>>> > consensus.
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> Having one place of knowhow of mapping is quite critical for project
>>>> like OSM. And believe me, creating good documentation requires quite a
>>>> skill and isn't easiest job in IT world as we would like to see.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Peter.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> talk mailing list
>>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Graham Jones
>> Hartlepool, UK
>> email: grahamjones139 at gmail.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Graham Jones
Hartlepool, UK
email: grahamjones139 at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100311/889d8042/attachment.html>