[OSM-talk] On the ground rule on the wiki

[Ian Dees]

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Gustav Foseid <gustavf at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>wrote:
>
>> Something that is available from an official online source but not
>> verifiable on the ground should not - in my personal opinion - be
>> included in OSM.
>>
>
> No borders? No national parks? No nature reserves? No voltage on power
> lines? No named farms (unless the owner puts up a sign)? No names for peaks?
>
>
Except for borders, all of those things are verifiable on the ground. I
think that is Frederik's point.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100531/b8636d71/attachment.html>