[OSM-talk] highway=ford vs ford=yes

[Gorm E. Johnsen]

Elisabeth

I don't *_have_ to* change the nodes. I ask if it's a good idea.
And I asked (in the original post) for comments on the wiki. I believe the
wiki is a better arena for it. You can of course continue here if you like.
I have argued that I would like to do it for consistency. Most *_*ways*_* is
already changed, so I think it would be nice to do the same with nodes.
Apparently you oppose to that idea. Then I suggest you put a no-vote on the
wiki. I also hope you put together a sentence or two why you oppose it.

All

I sense there might be a misunderstanding here: I have _not_ changed the
geometry of the way-fords (apart from connecting them to existing riverbanks
where available, and a few other minor adjustments). I am _not_ proposing to
create ways out of single nodes tagged with highway=ford. I'm simply asking
to replace highway=ford with ford=yes on nodes as well.

best regards



On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Elizabeth Dodd <edodd at billiau.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:51:47 +0100
> "Gorm E. Johnsen" <osmlist at gorm.cc> wrote:
>
> > Now I ask for a simple yes or no or better alternatives for changing
> > the tagging scheme for a few k *nodes*.
> >
> > Please, can we continue the discussion on the wiki?
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:ford
>
> Simply No, and No
> *why* do you have to change the nodes?
> and *why* do you want us to switch to arguing on the wiki?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101102/8a369e19/attachment.html>