[OSM-talk] New site about the license change
Serge Wroclawski
emacsen at gmail.com
Sat Nov 20 13:18:39 GMT 2010
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Simon Ward <simon at bleah.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:18:41PM +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> 2010/11/16 David Murn <davey at incanberra.com.au>:
>>
>> > Maybe I missed something, but when were the decisions made?
>>
>>
>> back in 2008
>
> The decisions had to be “the current licence is not suitable, we should
> find something more suitable” rather than any specific instances of the
> ODbL and CTs which were developed much later.
I remember hearing about the ODbL in 2007, its final version was
published in 2008 and the motion to adopt it was made in 2008.
The CT is a separate issue, and that was only ratified in (I believe)
2010 in its current form.
IMHO the CT is the more vital of the two documents for the long term
success of the project.
- Serge
More information about the talk
mailing list