[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

[pavithran]

On 25 November 2010 00:03, Emilie Laffray <emilie.laffray at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But on the other OSM should not be as a big companies wants it to be.
>
> I agree with the statement that OSM should be what OSM wants to be. If the
> goal of OSM coincides with those companies, good, else we should not move
> out of our way to serve those companies interest.

Exactly , I am afraid of these big names and their influence . Oracle
and the set of forks which evolved from the FOSS projects it bought
out (call it ownership ! ) should be a eye opener !

Regards,
Pavithran

-- 
pavithran sakamuri
http://look-pavi.blogspot.com