[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference
osm at inbox.org
Fri Nov 26 14:30:33 GMT 2010
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com> wrote:
> I think everyone agrees that detailed legal discussion belongs on the legal list.
> Questions such as how any licence transition should proceed, deletion of existing
> bits of map, and how to organize the voting process are not legal arcana but
> questions of project governance, and surely belong on this list.
Quite common sense. The legal list should be geared toward legal
discussion of the license. The talk list should be geared toward
non-legal discussion of it.
More information about the talk