[OSM-talk] Response to A critique of OpenStreetMap

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Sat Oct 16 03:50:21 BST 2010


On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Randy Meech <randy.meech at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why would you expect that?
>
Because it would be in their best interest to do so.

> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Mike N. <niceman at att.net> wrote:
>> > And along those lines,  based on the constructive criticism, the default
>> > map
>> > shown on the main OSM page should be a "pretty map", using tiles
>> > from Mapquest, while mappers that have a need to view more details can
>> > select one of the existing map styles.
>>
>> Once OSM goes ODbL, I'd expect that Mapquest will stop licensing their
>> tiles under a free license.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>



More information about the talk mailing list