[OSM-talk] A warning about gates and other barriers
Dave F.
davefox at madasafish.com
Mon Sep 20 11:21:21 BST 2010
On 20/09/2010 09:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with access=private
> in these cases anyway)
This is a bad assumption to have. Just because a gate is closed, it
doesn't mean your not allowed access.
barrier=gate means it's a gate & nothing else. It could be open/closed &
all sorts of traffic could legitimately have access.
> or you have to indicate allowed traffic
> (foot=yes, bicycle=yes, etc.)). Why do we have to have a default?
> Defaults don't work because you can't differentiate between
> information not present and access=default, and therefore I recommend
> to tag explicitly in order to get unambiguous data.
Tag what you see on the ground. If you don't know, don't tag it.
Dave F.
More information about the talk
mailing list