[OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] In what direction should OSM go?

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Thu Sep 30 23:39:38 BST 2010


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> I think it's pretty obvious that my property boundary can be surveyed.
>>  I have a survey of it!
>
> So is your point that everything (relatively permanent and worth
> mapping?) can be surveyed, and thus there's no reason to have a
> separate database that gets rendered together with the main OSM
> database?

No, that was not my point.



More information about the talk mailing list