[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Mon Aug 29 16:01:49 BST 2011


On 29/08/11 16:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/8/29 Steve Bennett<stevagewp at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tom Hughes<tom at compton.nu>  wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation. So I guess we should avoid using name=* on
>> anything which should not be rendered.
>
>
> +1, IMHO it is also generally disputable to keep coverage-polygons of
> other data providers in the OSM main database.

Yes I should have added that, in this case, my preference would be to 
remove the object altogether as aerial imagery coverage areas are not 
real on the ground objects that should be in our database.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/



More information about the talk mailing list