[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

[Stephen Hope]

On 30 August 2011 01:01, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:
> Yes I should have added that, in this case, my preference would be to remove
> the object altogether as aerial imagery coverage areas are not real on the
> ground objects that should be in our database.

Particularly in this specific case, as nearmap coverage can't be used
to derive OSM objects any more.

Stephen