[OSM-talk] tools for the transition (was: Editing of content that will be deleted on April 1st)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Edward Hillsman wrote:
> that Potlatch does not highlight everything that even the OSM 
> Inspector designates as being at risk of removal or reversion 
> (giving false positives and false negatives; I have identified 
> one of each in the area I map)

Potlatch 2 uses exactly the same source as OSM Inspector - Frederik's Quick
History Service (http://wtfe.gryph.de/). The difference is only in the
colour-coding: Potlatch 2 draws a distinction between "those who have
declined the CTs" and "those who have not responded yet", so that mappers
can prioritise remapping the areas affected by the former, and contacting
the latter.

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tools-for-the-transition-was-Editing-of-content-that-will-be-deleted-on-April-1st-tp7093456p7093516.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.