[OSM-talk] collateral damage
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Feb 10 19:19:12 GMT 2011
Hi,
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I think that in this particular case it might be OK that deletions
> were not undone (you could argue that deletion with Google as base is
> not possible, at least it would be almost impossible to proove). But
> for the license change I wonder: how will we deal with the deletion
> part of edits from contributors that did not agree to the new ct/odbl?
> Will these deletions be reverted or not?
This is certainly not going to be decided here and now, and quite likely
this is not even going to be decided on a planet scale ever - we might
employ a mechanism that does some things one way and other things another.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list