[OSM-talk] collateral damage

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Thu Feb 10 19:19:12 GMT 2011


Hi,

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I think that in this particular case it might be OK that deletions
> were not undone (you could argue that deletion with Google as base is
> not possible, at least it would be almost impossible to proove). But
> for the license change I wonder: how will we deal with the deletion
> part of edits from contributors that did not agree to the new ct/odbl?
> Will these deletions be reverted or not?

This is certainly not going to be decided here and now, and quite likely 
this is not even going to be decided on a planet scale ever - we might 
employ a mechanism that does some things one way and other things another.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"



More information about the talk mailing list