[OSM-talk] [Spam?]Re: [Spam?]Re: Underground / hovering buildings
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Feb 18 10:16:52 GMT 2011
2011/2/18 David Murn <davey at incanberra.com.au>:
> Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
working (is using wrong semantics), at least for the illustration you
can find in the wiki. building_levels should be the amount of building
levels. If a building forms a "bridge" like in the illustration, where
adjacent buildings have 7 levels, the "bridge" has only 2 levels and
the 5 levels below are void, the proposal states you should still
apply building_levels=7 and count the voids as levels.
This is against any common practise and definition in architecture,
building law and the definition of building_levels in the wiki.
PS: isn't this a discussion for [tagging] ? I suggest to continue there...
More information about the talk