[OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jan 9 17:53:30 GMT 2011
2011/1/9 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com> wrote:
>>
>> highway=unclassified
>> surface=unpaved
>> note=review:was-highway-unsurfaced
>>
>
> "unclassified" + "surface" is probably correct for most of the cases. But it
> sounds more cautious to replace it by "highway=road" + "note=deprecates
> highway=unsurfaced; re-survey please".
+1, I agree. I don't think you can asume that they are all
unclassified, roads without paving tend to be tracks in most locations
I have mapped. You cannot even be sure it is not a highway=path, so
road would be the best "intermediate" classification IMHO. I wouldn't
attach the note either (though it might not harm) as road already is
asking for re-survey.
cheers,
Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list