[OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim
Vikas Yadav
vikas at thevikas.com
Mon Jan 10 08:35:06 GMT 2011
On 10 January 2011 00:45, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>wrote:
> 2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) <mevikas at gmail.com>:
> > I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged
> in
> > order so nominatim can locate it. That went great. The problem is the
> every
> > house has to be tied to a street (addr:street).
> > 1) We don't have names for living streets
>
>
> are you sure you are talking about living streets or do you mean
> residential streets?
>
>
> > 2) We so many times have blocks or sectors (tagged as locality or hamlet)
>
>
> locality should be used for uninhabited places
>
locality is the way i could properly render blocks and sectors right now in
OSM india. please suggest if there is a better/proper way achieving the same
render result.
z12: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.408&lon=77.0776&zoom=12&layers=M
- you can spot sectors (govt sold residential area) as well as private
societies (private sold resi are).
z14: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.4141&lon=77.0564&zoom=14&layers=M
now, you can see blocks to sectors too like block A,B,C or Phase 1,2 or Part
1 or Part 2 which are within the same sector. (but there are no known naming
rules so there are always exceptions)
Only sometimes, street names are only connecting sectors. but never are
there street names within a sector.
>
> sorry, that I cannot help you with your original problem.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110110/04f8fa35/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list