[OSM-talk] FAQs from help.osm.org
Lambertus
osm at na1400.info
Fri May 6 20:44:04 BST 2011
On 06-05-11 21:15, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 06/05/11 19:31, Nic Roets wrote:
>
> Have you asked the sysadmins if they would consider such a solution
> acceptable? I would certainly be against it.
What part of the solution are you talking about and why, if I may ask?
>
> To the best of my knowledge the sysadmins have never received any such
> patch. Indeed as far as I know it doesn't exist.
>
> I originally understood that what you had on dev was a properly
> integrated solution but I now understand that it is in fact just
> static HTML and JS code that has been bolted on the side of the rails
> code.
>
'Properly integrated' means....? A bit of static HTML and some JS code
is what got the job done. I'm wondering what benefit rails serverside
scripting will add to something that requires mostly clientside JS
scripting?
Have the sysadmins ever clearly stated what the requirements would be?
All I remember was: a non-invasive solution (i.e. no extra menu tab) and
that it integrated in the main OSM website...
More information about the talk
mailing list