[OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Andrew Errington
a.errington at lancaster.ac.uk
Sun Apr 1 02:01:09 BST 2012
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
> > I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
> > version respects odbl=clean.
> >
> > The shapefiles are in their normal place at
> > http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
> >
> > Included is a .osm file with all the error points.
> >
> > There are no significant multi-square flooded or dry areas. The following
> > areas have significant number of error points:
> >
> > Pudget Sound in Washington State
> >
> > I just pulled the osm file into josm. I did a check of a couple of error
>
> points in the osm file in Puget Sound (Edmunds WA.) They appear to be
> about 10+ meters from the shoreline according to the bing image. Since I'm
> new at this, but since I live in the Puget Sound and would like to help fix
> it, what is an acceptable error distance? Also - the bing image doesn't
> give a date and time to determine the tide level. Or am I missing
> something?
Are you sure the Bing image is correctly aligned? There is no guarantee that
it is. Find a bunch of GPS traces nearby for a road or other very visible
feature and ensure they line up with that feature on the Bing image. If they
do, you're fine- use the Bing image to correct the coastline. If they don't,
then use the tools in Potlatch or JOSM to move the Bing layer into alignment
*then* correct the coastline.
The coastline should follow the line of high tide. Use your best judgement to
determine this. You're not missing something.
Best wishes,
Andrew
More information about the talk
mailing list