[OSM-talk] Naming disputes in Ukraine
Elena ``of Valhalla''
elena.valhalla at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 16:21:28 BST 2012
On 2012-07-25 at 13:54:28 +0100, Miloš Komarčević wrote:
> name= without the context of a language is somewhat useless from the
> database point of view, apart from quick and dirty rendering of what
> is on the ground.
it is a single usecase, but it is one that is very useful, and
in a significant number of cases it is probably enough.
In the cases where there is only a name for a feature, and
said name is in the official language for the country,
using just name is simpler and unambigous.
I wouldn't go below the country-level however: having e.g.
different defaults in Italy except South Tyrol, South Tyrol
except for a couple of municipalities, and said municipalities
would just be a mess.
In the areas where there are more than one language,
instead of just disposing of it I believe it is
better to use it for whatever name (or names) can be found
on the signs on the ground, since that is probably what
somebody who is doing a quick and dirty render/router
needs, and then sort-of-mandatory name:<lang> tags
can cover all of the other uses.
--
Elena ``of Valhalla''
More information about the talk
mailing list