[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering issue with *_link roads

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com
Fri May 4 16:16:16 BST 2012


That's why you need to know the lower of the two classifications being
linked (so you can put the link just under the lower one)

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, AJ Ashton <aj.ashton at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Is this behaviour of mapnik wanted? As I said: IMHO it is not pleasing to
> > the eye to see the unclassified road rendered on top of the primary_link
> > road. In order of priority, a *_link road is just below its * counterpart
> > but above the next lower road (so primary -> primary_link -> secondary).
>
> I would guess that, yes, this is the intention. The example you point
> out is only minorly aesthetically displeasing. But if links were
> rendered on top of unclassified roads, the situation of a link merging
> into an unclassified (rather than passing through) would look much
> worse. Example:
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2398828/scrot/link_order.png
>
> Granted, links don't feed into unclassifieds as often as they do
> higher classifications of road, but it still happens a lot.
>
> --
> AJ Ashton
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120504/9112bee0/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list