[OSM-talk] Edit review: intermittent waters

[Thomas Davie]

Actually, the conclusion, while it involved that, also involved that there are potential other uses (e.g. on river=intermittent; stream=intermittent etc) that need to be checked too, and that this seems like an arbitrary renaming of tags that doesn't gain anything, but may destroy data.

Thanks

Tom Davie

On 29 May 2012, at 20:08, Worst Fixer wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> I used "reply to" instead of "reply to all" in my mail agent. We had a
> small thread with Thomas. Here is major result we achived.
> 
> Thomas expressed opinion that not 100% of water=intermittent have
> other tags, so we have no way count them as water.
> 
> In my sub-extract of water=intermittent:
> 
> 127310 become intermittent=yes;
> 124417 have already "natural" tag;
> 749 get natural=wetland because "NHD:FType=Inundation Area";
> 2123 have "waterway" tag;
> 21 has "landuse tag".
> 
> 127310-124417-749-2123-21=0. Check sum passed.
> 
> This tag came from imports only, that is why it kann be cleaned up perfectly.
> 
> 
> -- 
> WorstFixer, twitter: http://twitter.com/WorstFixer