[OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] Continued aggression against French contributors (cadastre integration)
Michael Kugelmann
MichaelK_OSM at gmx.de
Thu Oct 18 23:48:23 BST 2012
On 18.10.2012 15:02, THEVENON Julien wrote:
> it means that we cannot distribute raw data coming from Cadastre alone.
> We are allowed to distribute them only if they are part of composite
> dataset/work ( = mixed with data coming from other sources ) and only
> if we add to them the information that they are coming from cadastre
> and the year of cadastre ( = our tag source= Cadastres.... 2012 )
> So the integration in OSM with the source tag by French contributor
> made them part of a composite dataset with cadastre attribution so
> this is fine.
Hmmm... That sounds very problematic to me. :-(
Just doing a thought experiment:
* Cadastre data are imported including this source tag
* somebody removes (or overwrites) for what reason ever the source tag
at last of some buildings (none in the french community can guarantee
that this doesn't happen)
* no one can expect that every lonesome mapper knows about the special
requirement for this special source tag and leaves it attached
* a normal planet is generated (not a flll history planet) and distributed,
* nobody using the planet in aware about this special cadastre-situation
using the houses as no information is present inside.
* the situation gets even worser is for what reason ever the houses with
removed source tag are seperated out of DB and distributed as planet
extract as a new DB just under ODBL.
_For me:_ the planet from above is illegal because some illegal data are
included. This could cause a lot of problems to the OSMF. Who in the
french community is willing to cover the risk?
BTW: this new DB is even more illegal. :-(
Just my 2 cents,
Michael.
PS: and you (= the french community) are not even willing to use
seperate accounts for such an hazardous import... :-(
-------------- n?chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20121019/d900eb53/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list