[OSM-talk] Import guidelines & OSMF/DWG governance

[Marc SIBERT]

2012/9/19 Michael Kugelmann <MichaelK_OSM at gmx.de>

> On 19.09.2012 11:22, Christian Quest wrote:
>
>> We're voting proposed tag scheme.
>>
> ... or not. Frequently nowadays a new value or scheme is invented w/o
> voting. No statement by myself whether I think this is good process or
> not...
>
>
>  So these hard rules are coming from nowhere ? There's no process to set
>> them ?
>>
> Please read the comment of Richard (in the archive:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/pipermail/talk/2012-**
> September/064300.html<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-September/064300.html>
> ).
>
>
>  Yes, I'm saying that editing the wiki is not clearly publishing and
>> ANNOUNCING a major change.
>>
> As stated by Richard: the change of the wiki was just a documentation of
> the best practice used since long term, I would not call this a major
> change.
>
> But to point also on the other issue which started the whole discussion:
> if someone contacts you because of you behavior (even if it is in a
> foreign language) you should not completely ignore him. The complete
> ignorance of any contact (threre have been two or three tries) was the
> reason for the (short term) block, not the disregard of the guidelines.
>
> In fact I *did* answer twice, in March & September. I explain my point of
view and the special case of Cadastre import. I do not receive any answer
after my response, excepte a blocked account a few days ago.
Nothing to do with foreign language in my personnal case.


>
> Best ragards,
> Michael.
>
> Regards,


-- 
Marc Sibert
marc at sibert.fr
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120920/e68aa68d/attachment.html>