[OSM-talk] Contents of talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33

[St Niklaas]

> From: talk-request at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:49:09 +0000
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:49:00 -0500
> From: Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>
> To: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> Cc: "talk at openstreetmap.org" <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Native American/First Nation,	etc. Reservation
> 	Boundaries
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAMPM96pie6-db=tOkPESR6KGPHQmf-Oiz0OoqXjFAHdEj=4Zyw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > Am 21/apr/2013 um 19:59 schrieb Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org:
> > > Is rendering the issue or tagging?
> > Yes.
> > IMHO we should get the tagging right and rendering will follow. As we
> > don't have similar situations in Europe it is unlikely that this is already
> > implemented
> >
> I still maintain Scotland, North Ireland and Wales are analogous
> situations. Martin,Although GB seems to be different to the USA, the basis is an agreement isnt it ? The tribal borders will however cross admin state borders since the tribal area's or countries do have a wider range.Greetz 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130423/50094a42/attachment.html>