[OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Kathleen Danielson wrote:
> However, as there has been generally positive feedback for the
> design of this attribution mark, would it make sense to move 
> forward with using the attribution mark (since it addresses an 
> immediate problem)

Definitely. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and all that. If you wait
for 100% consensus on talk@ you'll never get anything done. And, as ever,
stuff can be fine-tuned after initial deployment.

cheers
Richard





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-updated-OSM-Attribution-Mark-was-contributor-mark-tp5758043p5758370.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.