[OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

[Marc Regan]

Both the new mark and the copyright page look very slick.  Clean, friendly, inviting.  Great work! 

-- 
Marc Regan
Cofounder, Mapkin (http://mapkin.co)


On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:

> Kathleen Danielson wrote:
> > However, as there has been generally positive feedback for the
> > design of this attribution mark, would it make sense to move 
> > forward with using the attribution mark (since it addresses an 
> > immediate problem)
> > 
> 
> 
> Definitely. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and all that. If you wait
> for 100% consensus on talk@ you'll never get anything done. And, as ever,
> stuff can be fine-tuned after initial deployment.
> 
> cheers
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-updated-OSM-Attribution-Mark-was-contributor-mark-tp5758043p5758370.html
> Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org (mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org)
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130424/0976e39f/attachment.html>