[OSM-talk] Paweł's q: what can be done?
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Mon Feb 4 00:09:21 GMT 2013
Hi,
On 03.02.2013 23:59, Clifford Snow wrote:
> I want to make sure we are clear. Are you signaling your belief that we
> need some strategic planning?
I'm hesitant to say "yes" because your sentence can mean a lot of
different things to different people.
In the worst case, "we need some strategic planning" could be read as
"the OSMF should make plans for where OSM should be in ten years and the
project should then follow". This is certainly not a view that I would
subscribe to.
I tend to avoid the word "strategic planning" because it always sounds
so gloriously important (and attracts those who like that). Used by the
wrong people, the existence of "strategic plans" for OSM would make
every mapper but a pawn in some grand scheme thought out by the
glamourous architects without whom the project would be nothing. Nothing
could be further from the truth and we must avoid to give people such an
idea.
But of course it cannot hurt to think about the future together, try and
predict the problems we might be facing in five years, and make plans to
be prepared - rather than waiting for the problem to suddenly appear ;)
The 2011/2012 board has actually done some steps in that direction, with
Mikel reaching out to a number of professional strategic consultants and
getting a broad idea of what (if anything) they could possibly do for
OSM(F). The results were mixed and my reading (I wasn't on the board at
that time) was largely that with things as they are, we're not ready for
such a step yet. If Mikel himself would like to say a few bits about this?
Having a strategy is good but trying to find one can tie up a lot of
resources and personally I'm not sure if starting a committee is the
right thing. I think that OSMF should first get their house in order (I
mentioned several things reflected in the board minutes, like Management
Team, Articles of Association etc.) and then hopefully we are in a
position where the board of directors can spend more time thinking about
"strategic" things, and then, much, much further down the line, maybe
we'll even be in a position to fork out millions for a strategy
consultant like Wikimedia did ;)
This is all baby steps right now and IMHO not something that will yield
visible results in Pawel's desired half-year time frame. You have to
match up your high-flying thoughts with what can acutally be achieved,
and in the end OSM is about enthusiasts with their feet on the ground
(or their hands on the keyboard) whom we have to give all the support we
can.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list