[OSM-talk] Out of Service Roads
Florian Lohoff
f at zz.de
Sat Mar 30 14:30:51 UTC 2013
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:45:55AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> writes:
> > I think you can't define this on a global level, it depends heavily on the
> > local activity whether it makes sense to enter a mid-term interruption into
> > OSM or ignore it.
>
> Agreed that it's tricky, but for right now, I'd say a week is short
> enough to let something be, and a year is too long. The tricky part is
> From 2 weeks to 3 months. (That's a US-centric view.)
Its not that complicated IMHO - If the data is still useful with
the fault not beeing mapped - and rebuilding the infrastructure is going
to happen - let it untouched.
If people will need a 300km divert to get over the river, and the bridge
will not be replaced due to economic reasons its a different thing.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130330/caede1ea/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list