[OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary?

[Maarten Deen]

On 2013-03-31 17:57, Clay Smalley wrote:
> This seems silly and useless. The imagery is subject to change and
> the way will become obsolete. I don't see a point in mapping this, and
> I'm okay with deleting these ways. But I'd rather hear from someone
> with more experience before anything happens.

It is a common and often-used method to indicate regions that have 
high-resolution Bing imagery in an area where the rest is only 
low-resolution.
I would not delete them. They serve a purpose. If you have a better 
working suggestion (i.e. a low-hi-res overlay to use in the editors) 
then you might have a point.

Regards,
Maarten