[OSM-talk] iD Editor live on OpenStreetMap

[John F. Eldredge]

On 05/24/2013 06:15 AM, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> I don't regularly use iD myself (JOSM user), but, on behalf of its 
> developers: negative comments like this are unhelpful and denigrate 
> the vast amount of hard work that has gone into producing the editor. 
> If you don't like it, complain about it to your friends in private, 
> change the code, but do not slag it off on a public mailing list!
>
> Nick
>
> -----razor74 <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com> wrote: -----
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> From: razor74 <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>
> Date: 24/05/2013 09:36AM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] iD Editor live on OpenStreetMap
>
> The worst editor ewer. With this will result many damages and
> incompatibilities. From newbies ofcourse. Potlatch is the best blend for
> advanced users and for new ones with alot of info and very friendly
> interface. This is a joke. Take it down before destroyed the existent maps
> with alot of hard work on them!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/iD-Editor-live-on-OpenStreetMap-tp5760198p5760219.html
> Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
So, you feel that non-programmers, who have justified reasons to 
complain about the design, such as the silent removal of highway tags, 
should not be able to let their opinion of the bad design be made known?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130524/38296aef/attachment-0001.html>