[OSM-talk] Deleting data

Peter Wendorff wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Sat Oct 19 09:49:21 UTC 2013


Am 19.10.2013 09:41, schrieb Lester Caine:
> Russ Nelson wrote:
>> We need to make sure that the Wikipedia deletionism doesn't take hold
>> within OSM. Because, if I have to spend time defending the data I've
>> already entered, that will take away from my effort to enter new
>> data.
> And a lot of wikipedia articles still have pointless complaints attached
> about threats to delete material where THEY are the best authority for
> storing the original data. OSM is a similar 'unique' archive of material!
> 
>> In case you think I'm blowing smoke out my butt (who the hell
>> blows smoke out their butt??), I've entered about 90% of the lakes in
>> NY that are there, and about 50% of the rivers and streams that I have
>> looked for (so far). I've aligned the TIGER data in about 7
>> counties. It's a huge amount of work that nobody else is doing, and it
>> would be a shame if I had to stop people from deleting what I've
>> already done.
>>
>> I stand firm against deletionism!
> There should not be a 'delete' mechanism at all, only one which can
> amend or archive so that we can SEE the historic development of the
> information! This is as valuable as the CURRENT view ...
> 
Well - but that is already the case, what's missing are great,
reasonable fast viewers for this data (although some people are working
on it).

regards
Peter



More information about the talk mailing list