[OSM-talk] Wikipedia article
remillard.jason at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 04:11:22 UTC 2013
Your blog post is very interesting.
Just in case anybody thinks that the rapid growth of OSM is inevitable
at this point, this study shows how Wikipedia turned off its growth
like a switch when they starting clamping down on first time editors.
Since 2007 the number of active editors has actually decreased.
Unless the map in your area is 100% perfect and complete, be extra
nice to those new editors!
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Tom MacWright <tom at macwright.org> wrote:
> I wrote an article somewhat in the same vein:
> Perhaps something to note is that, beyond technical and policy issues, one
> of the more common complaints about Wikipedia is that there's an unfriendly,
> elitist attitude amongst the established editors. My article asks for some
> relatively deep changes to infrastructure and user experience, but the more
> actionable and immediately useful thing that everyone can do is to be
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Jason Remillard <remillard.jason at gmail.com>
>> The MIT technology review just published this article on Wikipedia.
>> It is sport criticizing Wikipedia, but two things stuck out.
>> Wikipedia is trying to get more editors. However, they seem to have
>> some additional problems that OSM does not have.
>> Wikipedia failed to roll out the new GUI article editor.
>> If you read the discussion on hacker news, and Slashdot.
>> It seems like Wikipedia has revert first policy on questionable edits.
>> It makes it unpleasant to start with the project, since probably every
>> bodies first edits are questionable.
>> OSM policy/culture of discussing a change *before* reverting is really
>> good thing.
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk