[OSM-talk] ReMAPTCHA Demo BETA 0.2 online! (Was: Hate captchas!!!!)

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Apr 28 07:54:47 UTC 2014


At least at face value, this presents issues for the US chapter, given
blind people...


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Kate
>
> 2014-04-28 7:40 GMT+02:00 Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>:
>
> > I think there would need to be audio challenges.
> > There are projects for helping make OSM accessible to people who are
> vision impaired, this includes information on the OSM wiki.
>>
>>
> I understand. But audio is a complete different technology and our project
> wanted to focus on visual clues.
>
> Yours, Stefan
>
>
> 2014-04-28 7:40 GMT+02:00 Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com>:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-04-27 21:08 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think a bigger situation is that I don't see how this could possibly
>>> be ADA compliant:
>>> > How does a blind person pass?
>>>
>>> We could add audio challenges - but that's not needed since the context
>>> and target sites where ReMAPTCHA is designed for, are geospatial websites
>>> and graphic editors.
>>>
>>
>> I think there would need to be audio challenges. There are projects for
>> helping make OSM accessible to people who are vision impaired, this
>> includes information on the OSM wiki.
>>
>>>
>>> -S.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-04-27 21:08 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:21 AM, moltonel 3x Combo <moltonel at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm worried about bots still having a very high chance of sucess. With
>>>>> two fairly-legible words in the image and a chalenge asking me to
>>>>> write either one of the words or both, a bot still has 33% chance of
>>>>> success if answering randomly, wich is high enough that bot authors
>>>>> won't even bother trying to smartly interpret the map.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think a bigger situation is that I don't see how this could possibly
>>>> be ADA compliant:  How does a blind person pass?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140428/fa0af06d/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list